Showing posts with label knowledge transfer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knowledge transfer. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Curation of Online Sources: A Rebirth for the Formality of Libraries

The internet needs the formal organization of libraries in order to be a relevant source of information.  Google's search engine displays results based on an algorithm hierarchy such as how much time searchers spend on a site.  Apparently, the more time spent on a page, the more relevant it is to what a person is searching for.  Another perspective is that the more confusing a site is the more time a person may take navigating its page(s).  The tens of millions of search results indicates that Google is not in the business of winnowing thus not in the business of relevance.  Relevance is not millions of sources.  Relevance requires narrowing.  There is not enough time in a person's lifetime to go through tens of millions of sources.

Based on:
  • Age Range 16 - 90
  • 365 days a year
  • 16 hours a day searching sources
  • 5 minutes a source
  • 5,185,920 
That is the number of sources capable of being looked at in a lifetime.  Obviously, this calculation is built on an abundant of assumptions, but the point is that search engine users have a finite time to spend on looking for sources.  Internet users are overwhelmed by the shear volume of results so the tendency is to choose the top search engine results  because we are taught that placement is equal to quality - first place is better than second place etc.  In essence, it is fatigue that underpins the Google search results because the selection of sources on the first page in the top position is what keeps that source on the first page in the top position.  Not relevance, but convenience.  Because the behavioral trend lacks a solution on a large scale, sources have sought to manipulate the results through search engine optimization (SEO).

Curation in the hands of companies such as the Huffington Post are self interested transactions.  The Huffington Post is a business in the business of people moving from source to source.  The click through fee is motivation to continue offering sources that pay the most money per click through.  The solution is to create a library system or library like options as aggregators.  Libraries work on relevance not popularity.  The library is organized by subject matter and obscure sources have as much right to discovery as does a so called popular source.  The Library of Congress is one such template.  Censorship is not a threat to the internet from a library aggregator because censorship already exists based on search engine algorithms.  A library catalog provides a level of parity between sources - parity that cannot be bought.  Libraries, at its essence, is about knowledge transfer.  Libraries facilitate the accessibility of knowledge.  

The internet is not about accessibility, but about popularity and if history has taught people anything it is about the danger of popular or dominant voices and/or positions.  Libraries are not without fault on some censorship issues in the past because of local citizenry, but libraries are also the one group that has done the most for First Amendment rights and discourse.  By creating a trusted online curator using the library template, people have a greater opportunity of being exposed to alternative perspectives and/or information.  Funding must be public via non-profits or government funds as it benefits the community be it local, national, or global.  It is time for the internet to grow up and become its full potential.  And a librarian is the best tool.


Thursday, January 12, 2012

China is Acting like the Newly Industrialized Country it is

The U.S. was there in the not so distant past.  The days of child labor, currency manipulation, corruption, lawlessness, intellectual property law violations, pollution, and human rights violations are eerily similar to the what China is being accused of.  Granted, the world has changed considerably since the U.S. committed much of those acts so there is some validity to holding China to a different standard.  The issue is that the U.S. stopped many of those practices because it did not serve a function or produce value anymore.  For example, one of the main reasons for the Fair Labor Standards Act that set child labor rules was to encourage the employment of adults instead of children.  Child labor was cheaper, which contributed to high unemployment for adults - men.

The single greatest resource for a country is its population - human capital.  The value of a country rises and falls based on the quality of its population.  A lack of education or intellectual capacity requires a reliance on physical labor because repetitive movement needs only basic intelligence.  Prosperity depends on the movement from physical labor to intellectual labor or knowledge labor.  The resource cost of migrating a physical labor worker to a knowledge worker is large.  As such, the knowledge worker can demand higher wages or the business can demand a higher price for its services.  Prosperity is the gap between the cost of living and the wages earned.

China is capitalizing on its cheap labor because it is the one resource in abundance, now.  Part of China's capitalizing is managing it currency to ensure that the labor remains cheaper relative to other currencies.  It makes sense that China would try to extend its cheap labor dominance until it can transform its economy.  China has to move to a more self sufficient model - creating products in country for its population - relying less on exports.  An artificially low currency also makes imports more costly for the Chinese.  By producing products and services cheaper than what it can import it for, means that China will see an increase in prosperity that is domestically generated rather than dependent on foreign businesses.

China has learned how to do this because of outsourcing.  The downside of outsourcing by developed or industrialized countries to China is the knowledge transfer.  It is evident in the counterfeit shadow market in China.  An export so large and pervasive that it is almost incapable of being solved because the resource cost for global enforcement is likely not worth it - at least not on a large scale.  Shadow markets or black markets necessitate a criminal element because the activity by design operates outside of the law.  There is no amount of contracting between multinational corporations and labor providers in China to prevent the theft of intellectual property.  It is laughable that a piece of paper was the barrier decided upon by businesses.  All it takes is an initial knowledge transfer and a little reverse engineering to create a better mouse trap.

China's one child policy is another reason, probably the greatest reason, why it has to move to a more self sufficient economy.  Less people to sustain its export dominance.  The preference for male children is expected to manifest itself in a much greater male to female ratio in the next 20 years.  Artificially limiting the birth rate is creating a natural limitation because there is expected to be a lot less females giving birth in China.  A high demand for females will encourage higher expectations for males to create an equilibrium, which is going to create social issues in China and for the global community.  Human trafficking, prostitution, kidnappings, rapes, commoditizing of females are just some social issues that may result.  And time is incapable of manipulation when it comes to the aging of a human beings.  Aging cannot be sped up or slowed down so any solution is dependent on time.  China has no choice, but to transform.

Just as the U.S. found itself with policies that were not conducive to being a global leader, China is slowly coming to the same realization of necessity.  The pace, however, is not the domain of the U.S. government.